Repository logo

Towards an inclusive Open Science : examining EDI and public participation in policy documents across Europeand the Americas


Article
Version publiée / Version of Record
Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Contributor(s)

Advisor(s)

Published in

Royal Society Open Science

Conference Date

Conference Place

Publisher

Royal society

Degree Level

Discipline

Keywords

  • Open Science
  • Science policy
  • EDI
  • Publicparticipation

Funding organization(s)

Trans-Atlantic Platform for Social Sciences and Humanities (T-AP) (2021/07508-6)
The Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC, UK) (R/172830)
CRSH (2005-2021-0011)
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) (2021/07577-8)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) (495515545)

Abstract

National, international and organizational Open Science (OS)policies are being formulated to improve and accelerateresearch through increased transparency, collaboration andbetter access to scientific knowledge. Yet, there is mountingconcern that OS policies do not effectively capture theethos of OS, and particularly its goal of making sciencemore collaborative, inclusive and socially engaged. Thisstudy explores how OS is conceptualized in emerging OSpolicies and to what extent notions of equity, diversity andinclusion (EDI), as well as public participation are reflected inpolicy guidelines and recommendations. We use a qualitativedocument research approach to critically analyse 52 OS policydocuments published between January 2020 and December 2022 in Europe and the Americas. Our results show that OSpolicies overwhelmingly focus on making research outputspublicly accessible, neglecting to advance the two aspects ofOS that hold the key to achieving an equitable and inclusivescientific culture—namely, EDI and public participation.While these concepts are often mentioned and even embracedin OS policy documents, concrete guidance on how they can

Table of contents

Notes

Notes

Other language versions

Related research dataset(s)

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

This document disseminated on Papyrus is the exclusive property of the copyright holders and is protected by the Copyright Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42). Unless the document is published under a Creative Commons licence, it may be used for fair dealing and non-commercial purposes, for private study or research, criticism and review as provided by law. For any other use, written authorization from the copyright holders is required.