An examination of concussion education programmes : a scoping review methodology
Article
Version acceptée / Accepted Manuscript
Date de publication
Autrices et auteurs
Identifiant ORCID de l’auteur
Contributrices et contributeurs
Direction de recherche
Publié dans
Injury prevention
Date de la Conférence
Lieu de la Conférence
Éditeur
BMJ Publishing Group
Cycle d'études
Programme
Organisme subventionnaire
Résumé
Résumé
Objectives The primary purpose was to review the
literature on concussion education programmes. The
secondary purpose was to inform knowledge translation
strategies for concussion researchers and practitioners.
Design Research on concussion education programmes
is relatively new. As a result, the current study
implemented a scoping review methodology, which is a
type of literary search used to provide a preliminary
assessment of the size and scope of a body of literature,
as well as identify strengths, weaknesses and gaps in
the research.
Methods A five-stage process for conducting a scoping
review was followed for this study: (a) identifying the
research questions, (b) identifying relevant studies, (c)
identifying the study selection criteria, (d) charting the
data and (e) reporting the results.
Results Concussion education programmes have been
developed and implemented with populations ranging in
age from 9 to 49 years and have used interactive oral
presentations, educational videos and computer-based
learning programmes. Although the content of these
programmes varied, the topics generally addressed
salient aspects of concussion injury and recovery.
Quantitative instruments have been the preferred
methods for assessment.
Conclusions Education programmes aimed at
improving participants’ long-term concussion knowledge,
behaviours and attitudes of concussions are needed.
Researchers must consider using a knowledge translation
framework to enhance concussion education
programmes. The application of such a framework can
lead to novel and interesting ways of disseminating
information about concussive injury and recovery.
Table des matières
Notes
©Authors or their employer “2015” is permitted
strictly pursuant to the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non
Commercial 4.0 International (CC-BY-NC 4.0) http://creativecommons.org
BMJ Authors Self-Archiving Policy, September 2018
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
This article has been accepted for publication in Injury prevention following peer review, and the Version of Record can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1136/injuryprev-2014-041479
This article has been accepted for publication in Injury prevention following peer review, and the Version of Record can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1136/injuryprev-2014-041479
Notes
Autre version linguistique
Ensemble de données lié
Licence
Ce document est mis à disposition selon les termes de la Licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d’utilisation commerciale 4.0 International. / This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
dc.rights.uri : https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Approbation
Évaluation
Complété par
Référencé par
Ce document diffusé sur Papyrus est la propriété exclusive des titulaires des droits d'auteur et est protégé par la Loi sur le droit d'auteur (L.R.C. (1985), ch. C-42). Sauf si le document est diffusé sous une licence Creative Commons, il ne peut être utilisé que dans le cadre d'une utilisation équitable et non commerciale comme le prévoit la Loi (i.e. à des fins d'étude privée ou de recherche, de critique ou de compte-rendu). Pour toute autre utilisation, une autorisation écrite des titulaires des droits d'auteur sera nécessaire.