Repository logo

Follow-up in low vision rehabilitation for users of assistive technology : a scoping review


Article
Version acceptée / Accepted Manuscript
Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Contributor(s)

Advisor(s)

Published in

Disability and rehabilitation

Conference Date

Conference Place

Publisher

Taylor and Francis

Degree Level

Discipline

Keywords

  • Scoping review
  • Low vision
  • Low vision rehabilitation
  • Assistive technology
  • Low vision devices
  • Visual impairment
  • Follow-up studies
  • Telerehabilitation

Funding organization(s)

Abstract

Assistive technology (AT) is crucial for aiding activities of daily living in individuals with visual impairment; yet, without systematic follow-up device abandonment rates remain high. This scoping review synthesizes existing literature on follow-up processes in individuals with visual impairment undergoing vision rehabilitation with AT. Employing the Arksey and O'Malley framework, this review comprehensively searched seven databases, identifying 1,061 articles, of which 43 were selected for analysis, using the concepts of visual impairment, rehabilitation, and assistive technology. The publications span from 1989 to 2022. Most studies (n=36, 83%) utilized a mixed-methods design, and 51% (n=22) originated from the United States. Devices for near vision were the most commonly prescribed type of AT. Follow-up methods included questionnaires and interviews, with most follow-ups conducted at the client's home. Follow-up timing varied across studies, whereby 37% (n=16) occurred after one or more years and 33% (n=14) between one week and four months. Three categories of outcome measures emerged: generic outcomes, task-specific outcomes, and a combination of both. The review identified several gaps in the literature, including a scarcity of research concerning follow-up of AT particularly for both the type and timing of follow-up.

Table of contents

Notes

Notes

Other language versions

Related research dataset(s)

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

This document disseminated on Papyrus is the exclusive property of the copyright holders and is protected by the Copyright Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42). Unless the document is published under a Creative Commons licence, it may be used for fair dealing and non-commercial purposes, for private study or research, criticism and review as provided by law. For any other use, written authorization from the copyright holders is required.