Contribution of a reflective debriefing to nursing students' clinical judgment in patient deterioration simulations : a mixed-methods study
Article
Version acceptée / Accepted Manuscript
Date de publication
Autrices et auteurs
Identifiant ORCID de l’auteur
Contributrices et contributeurs
Direction de recherche
Publié dans
Nurse education today
Date de la Conférence
Lieu de la Conférence
Éditeur
Elsevier
Cycle d'études
Programme
Mots-clés
- Clinical judgment
- Debriefing
- Nursing students
- Patient deterioration
- Plus-Delta
- Mixed-methods
- Reflection
- REsPoND
- Simulation
Organisme subventionnaire
Résumé
Résumé
Background
While reflection is a hallmark of debriefing, there is little understanding of how it contributes to nursing students' clinical judgment.
Objectives
The aim of this study was to describe how nursing students perceived that the Reflective dEbriefing after a PatieNt Deterioration simulation (REsPoND) fostered learning and how it contributed to their clinical judgment in patient deterioration simulations.
Design
A sequential explanatory mixed-methods study.
Participants
Nineteen students who showed the greatest clinical judgment score variation in a randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of REsPoND.
Methods
Students participated in interviews on their learning experience in REsPoND. Data were subjected to thematic analysis and themes were contrasted according to students' score variations.
Results
Through guided exchanges with their peers, students configured a causes–observations–interventions framework that embodied their understanding of the patient's situation. They evaluated their own simulation performance based on that framework. The contribution of REsPoND to students' clinical judgment differed depending on (1) the value placed on the review of the simulation through a systematic assessment approach; (2) their focus on anticipating the situation or on performing in the simulation; and (3) their preference for who participated more in debriefing.
Conclusion
Clinical judgment might be improved when a systematic assessment approach is used to structure debriefing. The relationship between reflection and self-assessment during debriefing remains to be disentangled.
Table des matières
Notes
Notes
Autre version linguistique
Ensemble de données lié
Licence
Approbation
Évaluation
Complété par
Référencé par
Ce document diffusé sur Papyrus est la propriété exclusive des titulaires des droits d'auteur et est protégé par la Loi sur le droit d'auteur (L.R.C. (1985), ch. C-42). Sauf si le document est diffusé sous une licence Creative Commons, il ne peut être utilisé que dans le cadre d'une utilisation équitable et non commerciale comme le prévoit la Loi (i.e. à des fins d'étude privée ou de recherche, de critique ou de compte-rendu). Pour toute autre utilisation, une autorisation écrite des titulaires des droits d'auteur sera nécessaire.