Improving the recognition and management of hemorrhage : a scoping review of nursing and midwifery education
Article
Version acceptée / Accepted Manuscript
Fichiers
Date de publication
Identifiant ORCID de l’auteur
Contributrices et contributeurs
Direction de recherche
Publié dans
Nurse education today
Date de la Conférence
Lieu de la Conférence
Éditeur
Elsevier
Cycle d'études
Programme
Mots-clés
- Clinical decision-making
- Clinical reasoning
- Education
- Midwifery
- Nursing
- Hemorrhage
- Interprofessional education
- Postpartum hemorrhage
- Scoping review
- Systematic review
Organisme subventionnaire
Résumé
Résumé
Background : Hemorrhage is a frequent complication that nurses and midwives must recognize and manage to avoid life-threatening consequences for patients. There is currently no synthesis of evidence on educational interventions in nursing and midwifery regarding hemorrhage, thus limiting the definition of best practices. Objective : To map the literature on nursing and midwifery education regarding the recognition and management of hemorrhage. Design : Scoping review based on the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines. Data sources : Quantitative studies evaluating the effect of educational interventions with students, nurses, or midwives published in English or French, with no time limit. Review methods :
Study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment were conducted by two independent reviewers. We characterized educational interventions based on the Guideline for Reporting Evidence-Based Practice Educational Interventions and Teaching. We categorized learning outcomes using the New World Kirkpatrick Model. Methodological quality appraisal was performed with tools from the Joanna Briggs Institute. Findings were synthesized using descriptive statistics and graphical methods. Result : Most of the 38 studies used a single-group design (n = 26, 68%) and were conducted with professionals (n = 28, 74%) in hospital settings (n = 20, 53%). Most were of low (n = 14; 37%) or moderate (n = 18, 47%) methodological quality. Most interventions focused on postpartum hemorrhage (n = 34, 89%) and combined two or more teaching strategies (n = 25, 66%), often pairing an informational segment (e.g., lecture, readings) with a practical session (e.g., workshop, simulation). Learning outcomes related to the management (n = 27; 71%) and recognition of hemorrhage (n = 19, 50%), as well as results for patients and organizations (n = 9, 24%). Conclusion : Considerable heterogeneity in interventions and learning outcomes precluded conducting a systematic review of effectiveness. High-quality, controlled studies are needed, particularly in surgery and trauma. Reflection on the contribution of nurses and midwives to the detection, monitoring, and management of hemorrhage could enrich the content and expected outcomes of hemorrhage education.
Table des matières
Notes
Notes
Autre version linguistique
Ensemble de données lié
Licence
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 DEED : Attribution - Pas d’Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International
Approbation
Évaluation
Complété par
Référencé par
Ce document diffusé sur Papyrus est la propriété exclusive des titulaires des droits d'auteur et est protégé par la Loi sur le droit d'auteur (L.R.C. (1985), ch. C-42). Sauf si le document est diffusé sous une licence Creative Commons, il ne peut être utilisé que dans le cadre d'une utilisation équitable et non commerciale comme le prévoit la Loi (i.e. à des fins d'étude privée ou de recherche, de critique ou de compte-rendu). Pour toute autre utilisation, une autorisation écrite des titulaires des droits d'auteur sera nécessaire.