The effect of contextual risk factors on the effectiveness of brief personality‐targeted interventions for adolescent alcohol use and misuse : a cluster‐randomized trial
Article
Version acceptée / Accepted Manuscript
Date de publication
Autrices et auteurs
Identifiant ORCID de l’auteur
Contributrices et contributeurs
Direction de recherche
Publié dans
Alcoholism : clinical and experimental research
Date de la Conférence
Lieu de la Conférence
Éditeur
Wiley
Cycle d'études
Programme
Mots-clés
- Adolescents
- Peer victimization
- Personality‐targeted interventions
- School‐based alcohol use prevention
- Socioeconomic status
Organisme subventionnaire
Résumé
Résumé
Background
A range of school‐based prevention programs has been developed and used to prevent, delay, or reduce alcohol use among adolescents. Most of these programs have been evaluated at the community‐level impact. However, the effect of contextual risk factors has rarely been considered in the evaluation of these programs. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential moderating effects of 2 important contextual risk factors (i.e., socioeconomic status [SES] and peer victimization) on the effectiveness of the school‐based personality‐targeted interventions (Preventure program) in reducing adolescent alcohol use over a 2‐year period using a cluster‐randomized trial.
Methods
High‐risk adolescents were identified using personality scores on the Substance Use Risk Profile Scale and randomized to intervention and control groups. Two 90‐minute cognitive behavioral therapy‐based group sessions targeted 1 of 4 personality risk profiles: Anxiety Sensitivity, Hopelessness, Impulsivity, or Sensation Seeking. Multilevel linear modeling of alcohol use, binge drinking, and drinking‐related harm was conducted to assess the moderating effect of baseline peer victimization and SES.
Results
Results indicated that the Preventure program was equally beneficial to all adolescents, regardless of SES and victimization history, in terms of their alcohol outcomes and related harm. Receiving the intervention was additionally beneficial for adolescents reporting peer victimization regarding their alcohol‐related harm compared to nonvictimized youth (β = −0.29, SE = 0.11, p = 0.014).
Conclusions
Findings suggest that the content of personality‐targeted interventions is beneficial for all high‐risk youth regardless of their SES or experience of peer victimization. The current study suggests that using targeted approaches, such as targeting underlying personality risk factors, may be the most appropriate substance use prevention strategy for high‐risk youth, as it is beneficial for all high‐risk youth regardless of their contextual risk factors.
Table des matières
Notes
Notes
Autre version linguistique
Ensemble de données lié
Licence
Approbation
Évaluation
Complété par
Référencé par
Ce document diffusé sur Papyrus est la propriété exclusive des titulaires des droits d'auteur et est protégé par la Loi sur le droit d'auteur (L.R.C. (1985), ch. C-42). Sauf si le document est diffusé sous une licence Creative Commons, il ne peut être utilisé que dans le cadre d'une utilisation équitable et non commerciale comme le prévoit la Loi (i.e. à des fins d'étude privée ou de recherche, de critique ou de compte-rendu). Pour toute autre utilisation, une autorisation écrite des titulaires des droits d'auteur sera nécessaire.